VMware Host Isolation Response in a Nutanix Environment #NoSAN

I was recently discussing the Nutanix solution with a friend of mine and fellow VCDX, Michael Webster (@vcdxnz001) and he asked what the recommended Host Isolation Response is for Nutanix.

At this stage I must advise there is no formal recommendation, but an Official vSphere on Nutanix Best Practice guide is in the works and will be released asap.

Back to my conversation with Michael, Being that Nutanix is an IP Storage solution, my initial feeling is that Host isolation Response should be set to “Shutdown”, but I didn’t go into any more detail with Michael, so I thought it best to post a quick explanation.

This post also assumes basic knowledge of vSphere as well as the Nutanix platform, for those of you who are not familiar with Nutanix please review the following links prior to reading the remainder of this post.

About Nutanix | How Nutanix Works | 8 Strategies for a Modern Datacenter

So back on topic, in other posts I have written for IP Storage, such as (Example Architectural Decision – Host Isolation Response for IP Storage) I have concluded that “Shutdown” was the most suitable setting and recommended specifying isolation addresses of the NAS controllers.

But as Nutanix changes the game and has one virtual storage controller per ESXi host, so does this change the recommendation?

In short, No, but for those who are interested, here is why.

If we leave the default isolation address, (being the default gateway for ESXi Management), in the event the gateway is down, it will trigger an isolation response even if the rest of the network is operating fine, thus an unnecessary outage would occur.

If we configure das.isolationaddress1 & 2 with the Management IP address of any two Nutanix Controller VMs (192.168.1.x , 192.168.1.y in my below diagram) then an isolation response will only be triggered if both Nutanix Controller VMs (CVMs) are not responding, in which case, the VMs should be Shutdown as the Nutanix cluster may not be function properly with two Controllers offline concurrently as its configured by default for N+1 (or replication factor of “2” in Nutanix speak).

The below is a high level example of the above configuration.

NutanixHostIsolation

Related Articles

1. Example Architectural Decision – Host Isolation Response for a Nutanix Environment

2. Storage DRS and Nutanix – To use, or not to use, that is the question?

3. VMware HA and IP Storage

Example Architectural Decision – Host Isolation Response for FC Based storage

Problem Statement

What are the most suitable HA / host isolation settings where the environment uses Storage (IBM SVC) with FC connectivity via a dedicated highly available Storage Area Network (SAN) fabric where ESXi Management and Virtual Machine traffic run over a highly available data network?

Requirements

1. Ensure in the event of one or more hosts becoming isolated, the environment responds in an automated manner to recover VMs where possible

Assumptions

1.The Network is highly available (>99.999% availability)
2. The Storage is highly available (>99.999% availability)
3. vSphere 5.0 or later
4. ESXi hosts are connected to the network via two physical separate switches via two physical NICs

Constraints

1. FC (Block) based storage

Motivation

1. Meet/Exceed availability requirements
2. Minimize the chance of a false positive isolation event

Architectural Decision

Turn off the default isolation address by setting the below advanced setting

“das.usedefaultisolationaddress” = False

Configure three (3) isolation addresses by setting the below advanced settings

“das.isolationaddress1″ = 192.168.1.1 (Core Router)

“das.isolationaddress2″ = 192.168.1.2 (Core Switch 1 )

“das.isolationaddress3″ = 192.168.1.3 (Core Switch 2 )

Configure Datastore Heartbeating with “Select any of the clusters datastores”

Configure Host Isolation Response to: “Shutdown”

Justification

1. When using FC storage, it is possible for the Management and Virtual Machine Networks to be unavailable, while the Storage network is working perfectly. In this case Virtual machines may not be able to communicate to other servers, but can continuing reading/writing from disk. In this case, they will likely not be servicing customer workloads, as such, Shutting the VM down gracefully allows HA to restart the VM/s on host/s which are not isolated gives the VM a greater chance of being able to resume servicing workloads than remaining on an isolated host.
2. Datastore heartbeating will allow HA to confirm if the host is “isolated” or “failed”. In either case, Shutting down the VM will allow HA to recover the VM on a surviving host.
3. As all storage is presented via Active/Active IBM SVC controllers, there is no benefit is specifying specific datastores to be used for heartbeating
4. The selected isolation addresses were chosen as they are both highly available devices in the network which are essential for network communication and cover the core routing and switching components in the network.
5. In an environment where the Network is highly available an isolation event is extremely unlikely  as such, where the three (3) isolation addresses cannot be contacted, it is unlikely the network can be restored in a timely manner OR the host has suffered multiple concurrent failures (eg: Multiple Network Cards) and performing a controlled shutdown helps ensure when the network is recovered, the VMs are brought back up in a consistent state, OR in the event the isolation impacts only a subset of ESXi hosts in the cluster, the VM/s can be recovered by HA and resume normal operations.

Alternatives

1. Set Host isolation response to “Leave Powered On”
2. Do not use Datastore heartbeating
3. Use the default isolation address

Implications

1. In the event the host cannot reach any of the isolation addresses, virtual machines will be Shutdown
2.  Using “Shutdown” as opposed to “Power off” ensures a graceful shutdown of the guest operating system, however this will delay the HA restart of the VM for up to 5 mins (300 seconds) if VMware Tools is unable to do a controlled shutdown, in which case after 300 seconds a “Power Off” will be executed.
3. In the unlikely event of network instability, VMs may be Shutdown prematurely.

CloudXClogo

 

 

Example Architectural Decision – Host Isolation Response for IP Storage

Problem Statement

What are the most suitable HA / host isolation response when using IP based storage (In this case, Netapp HA Pair in 7-mode) when the IP storage runs over physically separate network cards and switches to ESXi management?

Assumptions

1. vSphere 5.0 or greater (To enable use of Datastore Heartbearting)
2. vFiler1 & vFiler2 reside on different physical Netapp Controllers (within the same HA Pair in 7-mode)
3. Virtual Machine guest operating systems with an I/O timeout of 190 seconds to allow for a Controller fail-over (Maximum 180 seconds)

Motivation

1. Minimize the chance of a false positive isolation response
2.Ensure in the event the storage is unavailable that virtual machines are promptly shutdown to minimize impact on the applications/data.

Architectural Decision

Turn off the default isolation address and configure the below specified isolation addresses, which check connectivity to multiple Netapp vFilers (IP storage) on the vFiler management VLAN and the IP storage interface.

Utilize Datastore heartbeating, checking multiple datastores hosted across both Netapp controllers (in HA Pair) to confirm the datastores themselves are accessible.

Services VLANs
das.isolationaddress1 : vFiler1 Mgmt Interface 192.168.1.10
das.isolationaddress2 : vFiler2 Mgmt Interface 192.168.2.10

IP Storage VLANs
das.isolationaddress3 : vFiler1 vIF 192.168.10.10
das.isolationaddress4 : vFiler2 vIF 192.168.20.10

Configure Datastore Heartbeating with “Select any of the clusters datastores taking into account my preference” and select the following datastores

  • One datastore from vFiler1 (Preference)
  • One datastore from vFiler2 (Preference)
  • A second datastore from vFiler1
  • A second datastore from vFiler2

Configure Host Isolation Response to: Power off.

Justification

1. The ESXi Management traffic is running on a standard vSwitch with 2 x 1GB connections which connect to different physical switches to the IP storage (and Data) traffic (which runs over 10GB connections). Using the ESXi management gateway (default isolation address) to deter main isolation is not suitable as the management network can be offline without impacting the IP storage or data networks. This situation could lead to false positives isolation responses.
2. The isolation addresses chosen test both data and IP storage connectivity over the converged 10Gb network
3. In the event the four isolation addresses (Netapp vFilers on the Services and IP storage interfaces) cannot be reached by ICMP, Datastore heartbeating will be used to confirm if the specified datastores (hosted on separate physical Netapp controllers) are accessible or not before any isolation action will be taken.
4. In the event the two storage controllers do not respond to ICMP on either the Services or IP storage interfaces, and both the specified datastores are inaccessible, it is likely there has been a catastrophic failure in the environment, either to the network, or the storage controllers themselves, in which case the safest option is to shutdown the VMs.
5. In the event the isolation response is triggered and the isolation does not impact all hosts within the cluster, the VM will be restarted by HA onto a surviving host.

Implications

1. In the event the host cannot reach any of the isolation addresses, and datastore heartbeating cannot access the specified datastores, virtual machines will be powered off.

Alternatives

1. Set Host isolation response to “Leave Powered On”
2. Do not use Datastore heartbeating
3. Use the default isolation address

For more details, refer to my post “VMware HA and IP Storage